Comparison of Berman and Ovassapian intubating airways for fiberoptic orotracheal intubation in anaesthetized patients

Authors

  • Lalit Kumar Rajbanshi Birat medical college and teaching hospital, Tankisinuwari, Biratnagar, Morang 56600
  • Satyendra Narayan Singh BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Sunsari 56700

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jsan.v3i2.15616

Keywords:

Airway management, Bronchoscopy, Difficult airway, Intubating oral airways

Abstract

Background: Intubating oral airways are widely used during fibreoptic orotracheal intubationin order to improve the bronchoscopic visualisation of the glottis and facilitate the procedure. This study compares the visualisation of the glottic opening with bronchoscope using Berman or Ovassapian intubating airway.

Methods: We conducted a randomised comparative prospective study one hundred twenty patients with no clinical indicators of the difficult airway. The two oral intubating Berman and Ovassapian airways were compared during fibreoptic endotracheal intubation in anaesthetized patients. The bronchoscopic view, bronchoscopic time, and the total time for intubation were compared.

Result: The bronchoscopic view was significantly better with Berman intubating airway (unobstructed view 74%) as compared to the Ovassapian airway (unobstructed 38.4%) (p-value 0.002). The Berman airway provided a significantly shorter duration for visualisation of the vocal cord and intubation of trachea in comparison to the Ovassapian airway.

Conclusion: Berman airway provided a better bronchoscopic view as well as shorter bronchoscopic and intubation time as compared to the Ovassapian airway.

Author Biographies

Lalit Kumar Rajbanshi, Birat medical college and teaching hospital, Tankisinuwari, Biratnagar, Morang 56600

Lecturer

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical care

Satyendra Narayan Singh, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Sunsari 56700

Professor, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care

References

<ol>
<li>Fasting S, Gisvald SE. Serious intraoperative problems-a five year review of 83844 anesthetics. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:545-53. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03017379">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03017379</a> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12067864">[PMid:12067864]</a></li>
<li>Jackson AH, Orr B, Yeo C, Parker C, Craven R, Greenberg SL. Multiple sites of impingement of a tracheal tube as it is advanced over a fibreoptic bronchoscope or tracheal tube introducer in anaesthetized, paralysed patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006;34:444-9. <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16913339">[PMid:16913339]</a></li>
<li>Greenland KB, Lam MC, Irwin MG. Comparison of the Williams Airway Intubator and Ovassapian Fibreoptic Intubating Airway for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2004;59:173-6. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03527.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03527.x</a> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14725520">[PMid:14725520]</a></li>
<li>Greenland KB, Ha ID, Irwin MG. Comparison of the Berman Intubating Airway and the Williams Airway Intubator for fibreoptic orotracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2006;61:678-84. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04704.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04704.x</a> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16792614">[PMid:16792614]</a></li>
<li>Patil V, Stehling LC, Zauder HL, Koch JP. Mechanical aids for fiberoptic endoscopy. Anesthesiology 1982;57:69-70. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198207000-00028">http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198207000-00028</a> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7091730">[PMid:7091730]</a></li>
<li>Ovassapian A. Fiberoptic tracheal intubation in adults. In: Ovassapian A (ed): Fiberoptic Endoscopy and the Difficult Airway, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996:71-103.</li>
<li>Johnson DM, From AM, Smith RB, From RP, Maktabi MA. Endoscopic study of mechanisms of failure of endotracheal tube advancement into the trachea during awake fiberoptic orotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 2005;102:910-4. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200505000-00008">http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200505000-00008</a> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15851876">[PMid:15851876]</a></li>
<li>Atlas GM. A Comparison of Fiberoptic-Compatible Oral Airways. J Clin Anesth 2004;16:66-73. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.04.003">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.04.003</a> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14984864">[PMid:14984864]</a></li>
<li>Murrin KR. Intubation procedure and causes of difficult intubation. In: Latto IP, Rosen M, eds. Intubation. London: Bailie` re Tindall, 1985:75-89.</li>
<li>Ovassapian A. A new fiberoptic intubating airway. Anesth Analg 1987;66:S132 <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/00000539-198702001-00132">http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/00000539-198702001-00132</a></li>
<li>Randell T, Valli H, Hakala P. Comparison between the Ovassapian intubating airway and the Berman intubating airway in fibreoptic intubations. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1997;14:380-4. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003643-199707000-00007">http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003643-199707000-00007</a> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9253565">[PMid:9253565]</a></li>
</ol>

Downloads

Published

2016-09-17

How to Cite

Rajbanshi, L. K., & Singh, S. N. (2016). Comparison of Berman and Ovassapian intubating airways for fiberoptic orotracheal intubation in anaesthetized patients. Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of Nepal, 3(2), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.3126/jsan.v3i2.15616

Issue

Section

Original Article