Comparison of ultrasound-guided abdominal nerve blocks and subarachnoid block as an anaesthetic technique for appendectomy: a retrospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/jsan.v4i1.17384Keywords:
appendectomy, coeliac plexus block, rectus sheath block, spinal anaesthesia, transverses abdominis plane block, ultrasoundAbstract
Background: Ultrasound guided abdominal nerve blocks are increasingly being used for anaesthesia and analgesia for surgeries like appendectomy, hernia repair in our centre. The aim of the study was to compare abdominal nerve blocks and subarachnoid block for appendectomy.
Method: Retrospective data of patients that underwent appendectomy either under subarachnoid block (Group-S) or abdominal nerve blocks (Group-A) for three months were collected from hospital records. The groups were compared for conversion to general anaesthesia as a primary end point of study and also for the time taken for the procedure, the first requirement of opioids, total opioid consumption and length of hospital stay.
Result: Out of 116 patients studied, 75 surgeries were performed under subarachnoid block and 41 under abdominal plane blocks. Two patients in Group-S and 1 patient in Group-A were converted to general anaesthesia due to inadequate blockade. The time taken to perform the block was around four minutes in Group-S and 12 minutes in Group-A. The mean pethidine consumption in 24 hours was 62.33+-16.63 mg and 23.17+-15.19 mg in Group-S and Group-A respectively. The time to the first dose of pethidine in Group-S groups was 224.66+-43.56 minutes and 813.17+-361.80 minutes in Group-A. The mean duration of hospital stay in Group-S was 5.14+-0.72 days and Group-A was 2.24+-0.58 days.
Conclusion: Appendectomy can be safely performed under subarachnoid block as well as the abdominal nerve blocks. The abdominal nerve block technique is found to be advantageous in terms of better postoperative analgesia, less opioid consumption and early hospital discharge.
References
<li>Antonio B, Carla DS, Francesco F, Angelo B, Marco V, Luigi P. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness. World J Emerg Surg 2016;11(1):44. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582784">[PMid:27582784]</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006397/">[PMCid:PMC5006397]</a></li>
<li>Rayamajhi AJ, Bhattarai PR, Yadav RK, Paudel SC, Pandit R, Shakya VC. Ultrasound guided abdominal plane blocks as anaesthetic technique for laparotomy in cancer patients: a case series. Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of Nepal (JSAN) 2016;3(2):90-2. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3126/jsan.v3i2.15625">https://doi.org/10.3126/jsan.v3i2.15625</a></li>
<li>Morimoto Y. Transversus abdominis plane block: a review of the technique and its efficacy. Anaesth Pain & Intensive Care 2015;19(3):357-360.</li>
<li>Yarwood J, Berrill A. Nerve blocks of the anterior abdominal wall. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain 2010;10(6):182-6. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkq035">https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkq035</a></li>
<li>Jain P, Dutta A, Sood J. Coeliac plexus blockade and neurolysis: an overview. Indian J Anaesth 2006;50(3):169-177.</li>
<li>Matamala AM, Vidal FJ, Sanchez AL, Bach LD. Percutaneous anterior approach to the coeliac plexus using ultrasound. Br J Anaesth 1989;62:637-40. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/62.6.637">https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/62.6.637</a></li>
<li>Carroll I. Celiac plexus block for visceral pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2006;10(1):20-5. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-006-0005-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-006-0005-3</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16499826">[PMid:16499826]</a></li>
<li>Matamala AM, Lopez FV, Martinez LI. The percutaneous anterior approach to the celiac plexus using CT guidance. Pain 1988;34(3):285-8. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90124-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90124-8</a></li>
<li>Kim SC, Hauser S, Staniek A, Weber S. Learning curve of medical students in ultrasound-guided simulated nerve block. J Anesth 2014;28(1):76-80. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1680-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1680-y</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23893012">[PMid:23893012]</a></li>
<li>Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Kettner SC, Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2010;104:538-46. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq069">https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq069</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20364022">[PMid:20364022]</a></li>
<li>Pablo EH, Diogo BC, Getúlio RO. Ultrasound guided nerve block. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2007;57(1):106-23.</li>
<li>Brooks BS, Barman J, Ponce BA, Sides A, Vetter TR. An electronic surgical order, undertaking patient education, and obtaining informed consent for regional analgesia before the day of surgery reduce block-related delays. Local Reg Anesth 2016;9:59-64. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S115432">https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S115432</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785096">[PMid:27785096]</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063487/">[PMCid:PMC5063487]</a></li>
<li>Laura TP, Richard T, Kathleen F, Erin T, Wing C, Myoung K, Joseph C, Marc R, Eugene V. Pharmacotherapy Relationship Between Potential Opioid-Related Adverse Effects and Hospital Length of Stay in Patients Receiving Opioids After Orthopedic Surgery. British journal of clinical pharmacology 2012;32(6):502-514.</li>
<li>Ashley MN, Charles ER. Percutaneous Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013;30(3):318-21. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1353485">https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1353485</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24436554">[PMid:24436554]</a> <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3773031/">[PMCid:PMC3773031]</a></li>
</ol>
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
