Experience of mass casualty management - the Rana Plaza tragedy: An anesthesiologists perspectives at a peripheral military hospital in Bangladesh
Keywords:
Anesthesiology, Bangladesh, Mass casualty incident, Patient care managementAbstract
Background: The worst factory disaster in the history of Bangladesh occurred when a nine-storied commercial building Rana Plaza collapsed outskirts of the capital city. In our hospital there were no documented guidelines for dealing with mass casualty incident. Our aim was to share the experience of managing mass casualty.
Methods: Outcome of working experience based on four principles issues (assessment of available resources, ensuring critical but limited care, stocking up medicine and equipment for patient surge, tough rationing of decision) was assessed retrospectively. Clinical records of 155 patients were investigated. The discharge diagnosis, x-ray or computerized tomography was used for verification of injuries.
Results: Among 431 patients reported to emergency and casualty department, 407 (94.431%) were admitted to hospital. Among them, 155 (35.9%) required anesthesia and/or intensive care. Most of the injuries were blunt trauma and soft tissue trauma. Other injuries included fractures, head and crush injuries. Majority of surgical procedure were wound debridment, fascitomy, amputation and external fixation. Most of the surgical procedures (85%) were performed under ketamine, 22 (15%) patients received different regional techniques and only one patient received general anesthesia. Injuries requiring definitive surgery were referred to different tertiary level hospital. One patient died of lethal injuries and all the others survived. Fifty one patients survived with disability.
Conclusions: Anesthesiologists can improve patient care and hospital efficiency by optimizing facility utilization, surgical/anesthesia logistics, man power management, institutional communication, and leadership. Considering setup with limited workforce and equipment, management of mass casualty based on four simple principal issues might help others in managing such events.
References
2. Leggat PA, Hodge JV, Aitken P. Disaster Response and Preparedness. Annals of the Australasian College of Tropical Medicine 2005;6:17-8.
3. Wong DRN. Managing mass casualty events is just the application of normal activity on a grander scale for the emergency health services. Or is it? Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care (JEPHC) 2012:1-10.
4. Alywin CJ, Konig TC, Brennan NW, Shirley PJ, Davies G, Walsh MS, et al. Reduction in Critical Mortality in Urban Mass Casualty Incidents: Analysis of Triage, Surge and Resource Use After The London Bombings on July 7, 2005. Lancet 2006;368:2219-25.
5. Danna D, Bernard M. Improvements in Disaster Planning and Directions for Nursing Management. The Journal of Nursing Administration 2009;39:424-31.
6. Brismar B, Linder B. Disaster Medicine - Reflections on Goals and Developments. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 2001;8:137-40.
7. Kaji A, Koenig KL, Bey T. Surge capacity for health care systems: a conceptual framework. Academic Emergency Medicine 2006 13:1157-9.
8. Cook A. The dangers of stockpiling: planning rules change as hospitals brace for potential disasters. Mater Manag Health Care 2007;16:32-4.
9. Moon S. Taking cost off supply shelf: healthcare turning to supply chain management techniques honed by retail, manufacturing to limit inventory, slash expenses. Mod Healthc 2004;34:26-8.
10. Hirshberg A, Holcomb JB, Mattox KL. Hospital trauma care in multiple-casualty incidents: a critical view. Ann Emerg med 2001;37:647-52.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
