Comparison of Lignocaine and Esmolol in attenuating cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

Authors

  • Anil Shrestha Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur
  • Subhash Prasad Acharya Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu
  • Roshana Amatya Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu

Keywords:

Cardiovascular physiology, Endotracheal intubation, Esmolol, Hemodynamics, Lignocaine

Abstract

Background: Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation induces cardiovascular stress response characterized by tachycardia and hypertension, which are well tolerated in normotensive individuals but are of greater significance in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disorders. The quest for an effective suppression of these responses continues.

Materials and Methods: A randomized, prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study was conducted in which the efficacy of Lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg and Esmolol 1.5 mg/kg were compared in attenuating the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in sixty patients undergoing elective surgery under general endotracheal anaesthesia. Patients were divided into three groups receiving Lignocaine, Esmolol or Normal saline (control). Anaesthesia was induced with intravenous Thiopental Sodium 5 mg/kg and intubation was facilitated with Vecuronium 0.12 mg/kg after administering the study drug. Blood pressure and heart rate were compared among the three groups.

Results: The increase in Systolic blood pressure was not significant, but Diastolic and Mean Arterial Pressures increased significantly in control group whereas it was attenuated more effectively in Esmolol group (p<0.05) compared to lignocaine group. The increase in HR was significantly lower (p<0.05) in Esmolol group compared with lignocaine and control group.

Conclusion: Esmolol is more effective than lignocaine in attenuating cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.

Author Biography

Anil Shrestha, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur

Lecturer, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.

References

1. Forbes AM, Dally FG. Acute hypertension during intubation of anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in normotensive man. Br J Anaesth 1970;42:618-24.
2. Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, Villanueva R, King BD. Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1977;47:524-5.
3. Gorcczynski RJ, Shaffer JE, Lee RJ. Pharmacology of ASL- 8052, a novel beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist with an ultrashort duration of action. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1983;5:668-677.
4. Low JM, Harvey JT, Prys-Roberts C, Olukoga AO, Boulton AJ, McLeod D. Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension. VII. Adrenergic responses to laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1986;58:471-477.
5. Yokota S, Komatsu T, Yano K, Taki K, Shimada Y. Effect of oral clonidine premedication on hemodynamic response during sedated nasal fiberoptic intubation. Nagoya journal of medical science 1998;61:47-52.
6. Thomson IR. The haemodynamic response to intubation: a perspective. Can J Anaesth 1989;36:367-368.
7. Prys-Roberts C, Greene LT, Meloche R, Foex P. Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension. II. Haemodynamic consequences of induction and endotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1971;36:531-547.
8. Shimoda O, Ikuta Y, Sakamoto M, Terasaki H. Skin vasomotor reflex predicts circulatory responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. Anesthesiology 1998;88:297-304.
9. Youngberg JA, Graybar G, Hutchings D. Comparison of IV and topical lignocaine in attenuating the cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation. South Med J 1983;76(9):1122-4.
10. M. Andrew, Graham M. The efficacy of Esmolol and lidocaine in attenuating the haemodynamic response to intubation. Academic Emergency Medicine 2001;8:19-24.
11. Abou-Madi MN, Keszler H, Yacoub JM. Cardiovascular reactions to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation following small and large intravenous doses of lidocaine. Can Anaesth Soc J 1977;24:12-9.
12. Tam S, Chung F, Campbell M. Intravenous lidocaine: optimal time of injection before tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1987;66(10):1036-8.
13. Wilson IG, Meiklejohn BH, Smith G. Intravenous lignocaine and sympathoadrenal responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. Anaesthesia 1991;46:177-80.
14. Stoelting RK. Attenuation of blood pressure response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with sodium-nitroprusside. Anesth Analg 1979;58:116-9.
15. Ebert TJ, Bernstein JS, Stowe DF, Roerig D, Kampine JP. Attenuation of haemodynamic responses to rapid sequence induction and intubation in healthy patients with a single bolus of Esmolol. J Clin Anesth 1990;37:440-3.
16. Harbhej Singh, Phongthara Vichitvejpaisal, George Y, Gaines et al. Comparative effects of lidocaine, Esmolol and nitroglycerine in modifying the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. J Clin Anesth 1995;7:5-8.
17. Slogoff S, Keats AS. Does perioperative myocardial ischemia lead to postoperative myocardial infarction? Anesthesiology 1985;62:206-209.

Downloads

Published

2014-03-01

How to Cite

Shrestha, A., Acharya, S. P., & Amatya, R. (2014). Comparison of Lignocaine and Esmolol in attenuating cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of Nepal, 1(1), 29-35. Retrieved from http://www.jsan.org.np/jsan/index.php/jsan/article/view/pdf_19

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)